M00050433
New product
ASME NTB-4-2021 Background Information for Addressing Adequacy or Optimization of ASME BPVC Section III, Division 5 Rules for Nonmetallic Core Components
standard by ASME International, 06/30/2021
The purpose of this document is to provide background information on the scope, development, and verification of elevated-temperature design and construction rules as defined in the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code ("BPVC"), Section III Rules for Construction of Nuclear Facility Components, Division 5 High Temperature Reactors Subsection HH, Class A Nonmetallic Core Support Structures, Subpart A Graphite Materials, 2017 edition. The general requirements applicable to nonmetallic core components are discussed in BPVC Subsection HA General Requirements, Subpart B, Graphite Materials.
In stock
Warning: Last items in stock!
Availability date: 01/04/2022
Backgrou nd Information fo r Addre ssing Ade qu acy o r
Optimizatio n of ASME BPVC
Se ctio n III, Division 5 Ru le s fo r No nmetallic Core Co mpo ne nts
Prepared by:
Josina W. Geringer, Oak Ridge National Laboratory Timothy D. Burchell, Oak Ridge National Laboratory Mark Mitchell, Ultra Safe Nuclear Corporation
Date of Issuance: June 30, 2021
This manuscript was sponsored by the US Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Energy, under contract DE- AC05-00OR22725 with Oak Ridge National Laboratory, managed and operated by UT Battelle LLC. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. The United States Government retains, and by accepting the work for publication, the publisher acknowledges that the United States Government retains a non-exclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this work, or allow others to do so, for United States Government purposes.
Neither ASME, ASME Standards Technology, LLC (“STLLC”), the authors, nor others involved in the preparation or review of this publication, nor any of their respective employees, members or persons acting on their behalf, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe upon privately owned rights.
Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation or favoring by ASME or others involved in the preparation or review of this publication, or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of the authors, contributors, and reviewers of this publication expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of ASME or others involved in the preparation or review of this document, or any agency thereof.
ASME does not “approve,” “rate”, or “endorse” any item, construction, proprietary device, or activity.
ASME does not take any position with respect to the validity of any patent rights asserted in connection with any items mentioned in this publication and does not undertake to insure anyone utilizing a standard against liability for infringement of any applicable letters patent, nor assume any such liability. Users of a code or standard are expressly advised that determination of the validity of any such patent rights, and the risk of infringement of such rights, is entirely their own responsibility.
Participation by federal agency representative(s) or person(s) affiliated with industry is not to be interpreted as government or industry endorsement of this code or standard.
ASME is the registered trademark of The American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
No part of this document may be reproduced in any form, in an electronic retrieval system or otherwise,
without the prior written permission of the publisher.
The American Society of Mechanical Engineers Two Park Avenue, New York, NY 10016-5990 ISBN No. 978-0-7918-7458-5
Copyright © 2021
THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS
All Rights Reserved
ASME NTB-4-2021: BACKGROUND INFORMATION FOR ADDRESSING ADEQUACY OR OPTIMIZATION OF ASME BPVC SEC. III, DIV. 5 RULES FOR NONMETALLIC CORE COMPONENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents iii
Foreword iv
Abbreviations and Acronyms v
INTRODUCTION 1
CODE APPROACH 4
GRAPHITE STRENGTH 14
CODE VERIFICATION 16
SUMMARY 22
References 23
Appendix A: Graphite Core Components Code Development Progress Presented to ASME Section III (2005) 26
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: Comparison of the Behavior of Steels and Nuclear Graphite 2
Table 2: Safety Margins for Core Support Structures (In Tensile Loading) 8
Table 3: Design Allowable Probability of Failure 9
Table 4: Set of Verification Problems (VP) 18
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1: JAEA Methodology: (a) Design Stress Limit for Core Support Graphite and (b) Fracture Probability Density Function 6
Figure 2: Proposed ASME CE-3550-1 Service Categories and Stress Intensity Levels 7
Figure 3: Illustration of Design Margin 8
Figure 4: Design Allowable Stresses Flowchart for SRC-1 9
Figure 5: Schematic of Simplified Assessment Methodology (CDF) 10
Figure 6: Schematic of Full Assessment Methodology (CDF) 11
Figure 7: Weibull Probability Failure Prediction with the Full Assessment Method (PDF) 11
Figure 8: Typical Graphite Core Component Design Sequence 12
Figure 9: Typical Graphite Core Component Design Sequence (Continued) 13
Figure 10: Comparison of Predicted and Experimental Mean Failure Load for Verification Problems20 Figure 11: Comparison of Experimental Mean Failure Load and Code-Allowable Loads for Verification Problems 21
iii
ASME NTB-4-2021: BACKGROUND INFORMATION FOR ADDRESSING ADEQUACY OR OPTIMIZATION OF ASME BPVC SEC. III, DIV. 5 RULES FOR NONMETALLIC CORE COMPONENTS
FOREWORD
The purpose of this document is to provide background information on the scope, development, and verification of elevated-temperature design and construction rules as defined in the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (“BPVC”), Section III Rules for Construction of Nuclear Facility Components, Division 5 High Temperature Reactors Subsection HH, Class A Nonmetallic Core Support Structures, Subpart A Graphite Materials, 2017 edition. The general requirements applicable to nonmetallic core components are discussed in BPVC Subsection HA General Requirements, Subpart B, Graphite Materials.
Acknowledgements
The authors extend their appreciation to Dr. W.E Windes and Ms. A.L. Mack from Idaho National Laboratory (managed and operated by Battelle Energy Alliance) for their input and technical review. Stellenbosch University granted permission to use the work of the late Dr. M.P Hindley. His research was conducted as part of his studies undertaken at Stellenbosch University.
Established in 1880, ASME is a professional not-for-profit organization with more than 100,000 members promoting the art, science, and practice of mechanical and multidisciplinary engineering and allied sciences. ASME develops codes and standards that enhance public safety, and ASME provides lifelong learning and technical exchange opportunities benefiting the engineering and technology community. Visit www.asme.org for more information.
STLLC is a not-for-profit limited liability company, with ASME as the sole member, formed in 2004 to carry out work related to new and developing technologies. STLLC’s mission includes meeting the needs of industry and government by providing new standards-related products and services, which advance the application of emerging and newly commercialized science and technology and provides the research and technology development needed to establish and maintain the technical relevance of codes and standards. Visit https://asmestllc.org/ for more information.
iv
ASME NTB-4-2021: BACKGROUND INFORMATION FOR ADDRESSING ADEQUACY OR OPTIMIZATION OF ASME BPVC SEC. III, DIV. 5 RULES FOR NONMETALLIC CORE COMPONENTS
ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS
AG | against grain |
AGR | Advanced Gas Reactor |
ASME | American Society of Mechanical Engineers |
ASTM | American Society for Testing and Materials |
BPVC | Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code |
CDF | cumulative density function |
dpa | displacements per atom |
DOE | Department of Energy |
EIHP | extruded, isotropic, high purity |
ENHP | extruded, near-isotropic, high purity |
FEA | finite element |
IIHP | isomolded, isotropic, high purity |
INHP | isomolded, near-isotropic, high purity |
JAEA | Japan Atomic Energy Agency |
KTA | Kerntechnischer Ausschuss (Nuclear Safety Standards Commission) |
MIHP | molded, isotropic, high purity |
MNHP | molded, near-isotropic, high purity |
NRC | US Nuclear Regulatory Commission |
ORNL | Oak Ridge National Laboratory |
probability density function | |
POF | probability of failure |
POS | probability of survival |
RSF | reserve strength factor |
SF | safety factor |
SRC | Structural Reliability Class |
VP | verification problem |
WG | with grain |
v
ASME NTB-4-2021: BACKGROUND INFORMATION FOR ADDRESSING ADEQUACY OR OPTIMIZATION OF ASME BPVC SEC. III, DIV. 5 RULES FOR NONMETALLIC CORE COMPONENTS
1 INTRODUCTION
Before its appearance in the 2011 edition of ASME BPVC, there was no internationally recognized graphite core design code. Although the need for such a code was recognized by stakeholders such as the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and several reactor designer/constructers, it was not until 2002 that ASME formed a project team to initiate a graphite design code. Graphite is used extensively for reactor internal components in high-temperature gas reactor concepts, as it is needed to establish core geometries allowing coolant flow, reactivity control, and shutdown element insertion; serve as a moderator while supporting the nuclear heat generation process; and provide a passive heat removal flow path in certain licensing basis events [1].
Those functions are key to the operation and safety of the reactor system. One critical difference between graphite core components and the pressure vessel is that the graphite core assembly is a structure comprising many hundreds of components. The designers take measures to ensure that the failure of a single component does not compromise the function of the assembly.
The prior approach to graphite design was deterministic, similar to the approach applied for metallic components today. Graphite, with no strength in the plastic regime, was treated as a linear Hookean material. Any component that suffered cracking was considered a “failed component” and was removed. Additionally, only nonirradiated graphite use was addressed. This approach has been found to be inadequate for design and regulatory licensing. Graphite, because of its nature, is inherently cracked; and the absence of cracking cannot be ensured nor used as an indicator of absolute reliability, as it can be for metals.
After assessment, a new probabilistic approach was adopted. It concluded that the designer can allow for cracks in the component but must demonstrate through analysis and testing that the component can maintain the assigned safety function. Moreover, the design should account for the effects of irradiation on the thermal and mechanical properties of the graphite in the design of the graphite core and consider statistical strength variations within a billet, as well as variation from billet to billet due to different production runs. The new approach also does not follow the standard ASME practice of defining primary and secondary stresses but instead uses a combined stress approach that incorporates the largest stress contributors — irradiation-induced stresses and mechanical stress concentrations — as well as lesser stress contributors like combined membrane, bending, and peak stresses.
It was initially envisioned that the design code would be applied for helium-cooled high-temperature reactors, as that was the leading technology at the time.
The purpose of this document is to provide background information on the scope, development, and verification of elevated-temperature design and construction rules as defined in ASME BPVC Section III, Division 5 Subsection HH, Class A Nonmetallic Core Support Structures, Subpart A Graphite Materials, 2017 edition. The general requirements applicable to nonmetallic core components are discussed in BPVC Subsection HA General Requirements, Subpart B, Graphite Materials.
Similar to the rules for metallic components, BPVC Section III, Division 5, High Temperature Reactors is structured to provide a central location for all aspects of construction for high-temperature reactors, including nonmetallic components or, more specifically, graphite components, in the 2017 edition. For nonmetallic components, according to ASME code terminology, “construction” includes all aspects of Materials (HHA-2000), Design (HHA-3000), Machining, Examination and Testing (HHA-4000), Installation and Examination (HHA-5000), and Nameplates (HHA-8000). The rules stipulate details for material specifications (HHA-I), the requirements for preparing a material data sheet (HHA-II), and the requirements for generating design data for different graphite grades (HHA-III). It also gives reference guidance for consideration of factors such as graphite as a structural material (HHA-A) and the environmental and oxidation effects in graphite (HHA-B).
1