M00052868
New product
ASME MFC-1-2014 Glossary of Terms Used in the Measurement of Fluid Flow in Pipes
standard by ASME International, 08/28/2015
In stock
Warning: Last items in stock!
Availability date: 01/04/2022
Glossary of Terms Used in the Measurement of Fluid Flow in Pipes
AN A MERICAN NA TIONAL S T AND ARD
ASME MFC-1–2014
[Revision of ASME MFC-1M–2003 (R2008)]
ASME MFC-1–2014
[Revision of ASME MFC-1M–2003 (R2008)]
Glossary of Terms Used in the Measurement of Fluid Flow in Pipes
AN AMERICAN NA TIONAL S T AND ARD
Two Park Avenue • New York, NY • 10016 USA
Date of Issuance: August 28, 2015
This Standard will be revised when the Society approves the issuance of a new edition.
ASME issues written replies to inquiries concerning interpretations of technical aspects of this Standard. Interpretations are published on the Committee Web page and under go.asme.org/ InterpsDatabase. Periodically certain actions of the ASME MFC Committee may be published as Cases. Cases are published on the ASME Web site under the MFC Committee Page at go.asme.org/ MFCcommittee as they are issued.
Errata to codes and standards may be posted on the ASME Web site under the Committee Pages to provide corrections to incorrectly published items, or to correct typographical or grammatical errors in codes and standards. Such errata shall be used on the date posted.
The MFC Committee Page can be found at go.asme.org/MFCcommittee. There is an option available to automatically receive an e-mail notification when errata are posted to a particular code or standard. This option can be found on the appropriate Committee Page after selecting “Errata” in the “Publication Information” section.
ASME is the registered trademark of The American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
This code or standard was developed under procedures accredited as meeting the criteria for American National Standards. The Standards Committee that approved the code or standard was balanced to assure that individuals from competent and concerned interests have had an opportunity to participate. The proposed code or standard was made available for public review and comment that provides an opportunity for additional public input from industry, academia, regulatory agencies, and the public-at-large.
ASME does not “approve,” “rate,” or “endorse” any item, construction, proprietary device, or activity.
ASME does not take any position with respect to the validity of any patent rights asserted in connection with any items mentioned in this document, and does not undertake to insure anyone utilizing a standard against liability for infringement of any applicable letters patent, nor assume any such liability. Users of a code or standard are expressly advised that determination of the validity of any such patent rights, and the risk of infringement of such rights, is entirely their own responsibility.
Participation by federal agency representative(s) or person(s) affiliated with industry is not to be interpreted as government or industry endorsement of this code or standard.
ASME accepts responsibility for only those interpretations of this document issued in accordance with the established ASME procedures and policies, which precludes the issuance of interpretations by individuals.
No part of this document may be reproduced in any form, in an electronic retrieval system or otherwise,
without the prior written permission of the publisher.
The American Society of Mechanical Engineers Two Park Avenue, New York, NY 10016-5990
Copyright © 2015 by
THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS
All rights reserved Printed in U.S.A.
CONTENTS
Foreword ........................................................................ Committee Roster ................................................................ Correspondence With the MFC Committee ........................................ | iv v vi |
1 General ................................................................ | 1 |
2 Glossary of Terms ....................................................... | 1 |
3 Symbols ............................................................... | 38 |
Figures | |
1 Bell Prover ............................................................. | 2 |
2 Bias in a Random Process .............................................. | 3 |
3 Classical Venturi Tube .................................................. | 4 |
4 Correlation Coefficients ................................................ | 6 |
5 Principle of Operation of the Cross-Correlation Ultrasonic Meter ........ | 7 |
6 Principle of Operation of the Doppler Ultrasonic Meter ................. | 9 |
7 Example of a K Factor Curve ........................................... | 14 |
8 Liquid Displacement System ........................................... | 15 |
9 Three Valve Manifold, Schematic ....................................... | 15 |
10 Nozzles ................................................................ | 20 |
11 Orifice Plates .......................................................... | 21 |
12 Piezometer Ring ....................................................... | 22 |
13 Piston Provers ......................................................... | 23 |
14 Primary and Secondary at Same Elevation, Preferred Installation ........ | 24 |
15 Examples of Rotary Displacement Meters ............................... | 29 |
16 Sonic Venturi Nozzle, Smith and Matz Type ............................. | 30 |
17 Sonic Venturi Nozzle, LMEF Type ...................................... | 30 |
iii
FOREWORD
The greatest aid to communication, whether verbal or written, is a common vocabulary. Even within a single technical discipline, the same word can have different meanings to different people. In order to help overcome this obstacle in the field of fluid flow measurement, this Standard consists of a collection of terms and their definitions so that a common base of reference is available, so we can speak a common language.
To this end, we need to understand that language is fluid and the definitions given here provide a snapshot of usage at the time of publication. In the preparation of this Standard, an attempt has been made to standardize suitable terms and not to perpetuate unsuitable ones, merely because they have been used in the past. Recognition of terms in common parlance is acknowledged and less ambiguous ones are suggested. Self evident and irrelevant terms have been excluded, as have those terms that are unique to methods of measurement not widely used.
The international standard vocabulary and symbols concerning the measurement of fluid flow in closed conduits prepared by ISO/TC30 has been considered, as well as many other reference sources, both national and international, have been used in order to make this glossary as useful as possible to a broad segment of the measurement community. This Standard varies from earlier revisions in that all terms are listed alphabetically.
The first edition of this Standard was approved by the American National Standards Institute on October 15, 1979. It was subsequently reaffirmed, without change, on August 7, 1986. The previous edition of this Standard was approved by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) on September 10, 2003. It was subsequently reaffirmed, without change, in 2008.
Suggestions for improvement of this Standard are welcome. They should be sent to Secretary, ASME MFC Standards Committee, Two Park Avenue, New York, NY 10016-5990.
This revision was approved by the American National Standards Institute on August 1, 2014.
iv
ASME MFC COMMITTEE
Measurement of Fluid Flow in Closed Conduits
(The following is the roster of the Committee at the time of approval of this Standard.)
STANDARDS COMMITTEE OFFICERS
R. J. DeBoom, Chair
Z. D. Husain, Vice Chair
D. C. Wyatt, Vice Chair
C. J. Gomez, Secretary
C. J. Blechinger, Honorary Member, Consultant
R. M. Bough, Rolls-Royce Corp.
M. S. Carter, Flow Systems, Inc.
G. P. Corpron, Honorary Member, Consultant
R. J. DeBoom, Consultant
STANDARDS COMMITTEE PERSONNEL
G. E. Mattingly, The Catholic University of America
R. W. Miller, Honorary Member, R. W. Miller and Associates, Inc.
A. Quraishi, American Gas Association
W. Seidl, Colorado Engineering Experiment Station, Inc.
D. W. Spitzer, Contributing Member, Spitzer and Boyes LLC
D. Faber, Contributing Member, Badger Meter, Inc.
C. J. Gomez, The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
F. D. Goodson, Emerson Process Management/Daniel Division
Z. D. Husain, Chevron Corp.
C. G. Langford, Honorary Member, Consultant
T. O. Maginnis, Consultant
W. M. Mattar, Invensys/Foxboro Co.
R. N. Steven, Colorado Engineering Experiment Station, Inc.
T. M. Kegel, Alternate, Colorado Engineering Experiment Station, Inc.
J. H. Vignos, Honorary Member, Consultant
D. E. Wiklund, Emerson Process Management/Rosemount Division
J. D. Wright, Contributing Member, NIST
D. C. Wyatt, Wyatt Engineering
D. C. Wyatt, Chair, Wyatt Engineering
R. J. DeBoom, Consultant
SUBCOMMITTEE 1 — GLOSSARY OF TERMS
G. E. Mattingly, The Catholic University of America
A. Quraishi, American Gas Association
F. D. Goodson, Emerson Process Management/Daniel Division
Z. D. Husain, Chevron Corp.
R. N. Steven, Colorado Engineering Experiment Station, Inc.
D. E. Wiklund, Emerson Process Management/Rosemount Division
v
CORRESPONDENCE WITH THE MFC COMMITTEE
General. ASME Standards are developed and maintained with the intent to represent the consensus of concerned interests. As such, users of this Standard may interact with the Committee by requesting interpretations, proposing revisions or a Case, and attending Committee meetings. Correspondence should be addressed to:
Secretary, MFC Standards Committee
The American Society of Mechanical Engineers Two Park Avenue
New York, NY 10016-5990
https://go.asme.org/Inquiry
Proposing Revisions. Revisions are made periodically to the Standard to incorporate changes that appear necessary or desirable, as demonstrated by the experience gained from the applica- tion of the Standard. Approved revisions will be published periodically.
The Committee welcomes proposals for revisions to this Standard. Such proposals should be as specific as possible, citing the paragraph number(s), the proposed wording, and a detailed description of the reasons for the proposal, including any pertinent documentation.
Proposing a Case. Cases may be issued for the purpose of providing alternative rules when justified, to permit early implementation of an approved revision when the need is urgent, or to provide rules not covered by existing provisions. Cases are effective immediately upon ASME approval and shall be posted on the ASME Committee Web page.
Requests for Cases shall provide a Statement of Need and Background Information. The request should identify the Standard and the paragraph, figure, or table number(s), and be written as a Question and Reply in the same format as existing Cases. Requests for Cases should also indicate the applicable edition(s) of the Standard to which the proposed Case applies.
Interpretations. Upon request, the MFC Standards Committee will render an interpretation of any requirement of the Standard. Interpretations can only be rendered in response to a written request sent to the Secretary of the MFC Standards Committee at go.asme.org/Inquiry.
The request for interpretation should be clear and unambiguous. It is further recommended that the inquirer submit his/her request in the following format:
Subject: Cite the applicable paragraph number(s) and the topic of the inquiry.
Edition: Cite the applicable edition of the Standard for which the interpretation is being requested.
Question: Phrase the question as a request for an interpretation of a specific requirement suitable for general understanding and use, not as a request for an approval of a proprietary design or situation. The inquirer may also include any plans or drawings that are necessary to explain the question; however, they should not contain proprietary names or information.
Request that are not in this format may be rewritten in the appropriate format by the Committee prior to being answered, which may inadvertently change the intent of the original request.
ASME procedures provide for reconsideration of any interpretation when or if additional information that might affect an interpretation is available. Further, persons aggrieved by an interpretation may appeal to the cognizant ASME Committee or Subcommittee. ASME does not “approve,” “certify,” “rate,” or “endorse” any item, construction, proprietary device, or activity. Attending Committee Meetings. The MFC Standards Committee regularly holds meetings and/ or telephone conferences that are open to the public. Persons wishing to attend any meeting and/or telephone conference should contact the Secretary of the MFC Standards Committee.
Future Committee meeting dates and locations can be found on the Committee Page at go.asme.org/MFCcommittee.
vi
ASME MFC-1–2014
GLOSSARY OF TERMS USED IN THE MEASUREMENT OF FLUID FLOW IN PIPES
GENERAL
Scope
This Standard consists of a collection of definitions of those terms that pertain to the measurement of fluid flow in pipes. The definitions provided also give guid- ance for recommended usage in the application of flow measurement devices.
Organization
This Standard is organized alphabeticlly. Symbols nor- mally applied to various quantities are tabulated in section 3.
References
This Standard was compiled from many sources, including various reports and standards from The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), the American Gas Association (AGA), the American Petroleum Institute (API), the International Society of Automation (ISA), the British Standards Institute (BSI), the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), the National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST), and the International Organization of Legal Metrology (OIML).
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
absolute pressure: algebraic sum of the atmospheric pres- sure and gauge pressure.
absolute static pressure of a fluid: static pressure of a fluid measured with reference to a perfect vacuum.
acceptance test: the evaluating action(s) to determine if an instrument satisfactorily meets its performance criteria, permitting the owner/purchaser to formally accept it from the supplier.
accuracy of measurement: the extent to which a given mea- surement agrees with a reference for that measurement; often used by manufacturers to express the performance characteristics of a device.
NOTE: “Accuracy” is not the same as “uncertainty” (see “uncer- tainty of measurement”).
acoustic matching layer: material comprising one or more
acoustic path: the path that the acoustic signals follow as they propagate through the measurement section between the transducer elements.
acoustic ratio: the differential pressure ratio divided by the isentropic exponent (compressible fluid).
air: mixture of gases and associated water vapor sur- rounding the earth; dry air plus its associated water vapor. The term is used synonymously with atmosphere.
air, dry: mixture of dry gases present in the atmosphere.
ambient temperature: temperature of the atmosphere mea- sured in the immediate vicinity of the point of measure- ment and unaffected by wind or other atmospheric phenomena.
annular chamber: piezometer ring integral with the pipe or the primary device that simplifies the construction of annular pressure taps.
annular space: area between the tapered tube and the float that normally increases as the float rises.
area meters: flowmeter in which a variation in the cross section of the fluid stream under constant head is used as an indication of the rate of flow, e.g., a float is sus- pended in a vertical tapered tube and as the fluid flow rate changes, the position of the float in the tube changes.
arithmetic mean: the sum of values divided by the number of values, also called “average.”
NOTES:
The term “mean” is used generally when referring to a popula- tion parameter, and the term, “average,” when referring to the result of a calculation on the data obtained in a sample.
The average of a simple random sample taken from a popula- tion is an unbiased estimator of the mean of this population. Other estimators, such as the geometric or harmonic mean, the median, or the mode are sometimes used.
atmospheric pressure: force per unit area exerted by the atmosphere.
NOTE: Standard atmospheric pressure is 760 mm of mercury at 0°C. This is equivalent to 101.325 kPa and 14.696 psia.
average value: arithmetic mean of n readings of the quantity x. The average value x is calculated using the following formula
layers, selected to maximize the acoustic coupling coeffi- 1 n
cient between two media.
n
Xw p xi
ip1
1